Evaluation of Marginalized Women Guidelines & Grading Rubric
Check before you submit. Get Turnitin Score Report in 15 Minutes.
Don't risk the 'Red' score. Get the exact same Turnitin report your professor uses. Join 50,000+ students who submitted their essays with confidence this semester.
Requirements
This paper should clearly and comprehensively identify the disease or population health problem chosen. The problem must be an issue in your geographic area and a concern for the population you will serve upon graduation with your degree. The paper should be organized into the following sections:
1. Introduction with a clear presentation of the marginalized group as well as significance and a scholarly overview of the paper.
2. Background of the marginalized group/problem including description, current incidence and/or prevalence statistics current state, local, and national statistics pertaining to the problem.
3. Discuss the economic aspects of the marginalized group
4. Discuss social justice and its relationship to health disparities and health care of marginalized group.
5. Discuss ethical issues on marginalized group
6. Provide a brief plan of how you will address this marginalized group in your practice once you are finished with school. Provide three actions you will take along with how you will measure outcomes of your actions.
7. Conclude in a clear manner with a brief overview of key points of the entire problem
Preparing the Paper
· Women with Past Sexual Assault
Paper Length: 5-6 pages, excluding title/cover and reference pages
APA format 6th edition
Directions and Grading Criteria
CategoryPointsPossiblePoints EarnedCommentsScholarly Introduction (clear presentation of marginalized group)20Background and significance of the marginalized group (includes incidence or prevalence statistics)20Socio-Economic aspects of the marginalized group20Social justice and its relationship to health disparities and health care of marginalized group20Ethical issues of the marginalized group25Plan of action (includes at least three evidenced based actions, supported by literature, that the student will take in their own practice and how outcomes will be measured)30Conclusion10Mechanics of writing, APA5Total150Total Points earned =A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the criteria requirements.Chamberlain College of Nursing NR602May 2018
Grading Rubric
| Assignment Criteria | ExceptionalOutstanding or highest level of performance | ExceedsVery good or high level of performance | MeetsCompetent or satisfactory level of performance | Needs ImprovementPoor or failing level of performance | DevelopingUnsatisfactory level of performance |
| Identification of the chosen marginalized group | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 8 Points | 0 Points |
| Comprehensively identifies the chosen marginalized group. | Adequately identifies chosen marginalized group. | Identification of chosen marginalized group is limited. | Identification of chosen marginalized group is unclear. | Identification of chosen marginalized group is missing or not discussed. | |
| Background and significance of the marginalized group (includes incidence and prevalence statistics) | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 8 Points | 0 Points |
| Comprehensive review of background and significance of chosen marginalized group. Curent evidence supports background. | An adequate review of background but limited review of incidence or prevalence. Current evidence supports background and significance. | Limited review of Background AND limited review of incidence/prevalence.OR Lack current evidence to support. | Background, incidence and prevalence is unclear. missing one or more key point (background, prevelance or incidence). ANDLack of evidence to support. | Background and significance of the marginalized group is not discussed. | |
| Socio-Economic issues of the problem | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 8 Points | 0 Points |
| Clearly presents and fully explains the socio economic issues of marginalized group with current supporting evidence. | Adequate review of socio-economic issues of marginalized group with current supporting evidence. | Limited review of the socio-economic issues of marginalized group OR Lack of current supporting evidence. | Minimal or unclear review socio-economic issues of marginalized groupAND lack of current supporting evidence. | Socio-Economic issue(s) not reviewed. | |
| Social justice and its relationship to health disparities and health care of chosen marginalized group | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 8 Points | 0 Points |
| Comprehensive review social injustice is discussed along with its relationship to health disparitities and health care. Supported by current scholarly evidence. | Adequate review of social injustice with some discussion of its relationship to health disparities and health care but lacks one major point or is not succinct. supported by current scholarly evidence. | Limited review of social injustice. Limitied discussion of relationship to health disparitities and health care. Main points lack detailed development.Supported by current scholarly evidence. | Minimal review of social injustice. Minimal discussion of relationship to health disparitities and health care.ORInformation presented is NOT Supported by current scholarly evidence. | No discussion of social injustice and relationship to health disparitities and health care. | |
| Ethical issues of the chosen marginalized group | 25 Points | 22 Points | 21 Points | 10 Points | 0 Points |
| Comprehensive review of ethical issues current supporting evidence. | Adequate review of ethical issues. Main points lack detailed development. Current supporting evidence. | Limited review of ethical issues. list ethical issues or arrange them randomly rather than using any logical structure.ORLack of cuurent supporting evidence. | Minimal or unclear review of ethical issues AND lack of current supporting evidence. | Ethical issues are not discussed. | |
| Plan of action (includes at least three evidenced based actions, supported by literature, that the student will take in their own practice and how outcomes will be measured) | 30 Points | 26 Points | 24 Points | 12 Points | 0 Points |
| A comprehensive plan of action specific to the chosen marginalized group; three evidence-based actions to address the impact ANDoutcomes of the marginalized group. Supported by current scholarly evidence. | An adequate, but not fully comprehensive, plan of action specific to the chosen marginalized group;ORTwo evidence- based actions fully discussed to address the impact AND outcomes of the marginalized group. Supported by current scholarly evidence. | A limited plan of action specific to the chosen marginalized group; Twoevidence-based actions discussed to address the impact.Outcomes not discussed.Limited or little current evidence used for support. | Plan is unclear OROneevidence- based actions discussed to address the impact.Outcomes not discussedAND Lack of current supporting evidence. | Plan of action not provided. | |
| Conclusion | 10 Points | 9 Points | 8 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points |
| The conclusion thoroughly, clearly, succinctly, and logically presents major points of the paper with clear direction for action. | The conclusion presents major points of the paper with clear direction for action, but lacks one major point or is not succinct. | The conclusion is a limited review of key points of the paper, is not succinct, or lacks one or more major points of the paper or clear direction for action. | Conclusion is unclear or significantly limited in overview of the paper. | Conclusion not provided. | |
| Grammar, Spelling, APA | 5 Points | 4 Points | 3 Points | 2 Points | 0 Points |
| APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero errors. | One to three errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. | Four to six errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. | Seven to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. | Post contains ten or more errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and punctuationOR repeatedly makes the same errors throughout the paper. | |
| Total Points Possible = 150 points |
Get Quick Assignment Writing Help – No Plagiarism Guarantee!
Online assignment writing service website that provide university students with original and quality academic essays, term papers, admission essays, annotated bibliographies, reports, scholarship essays, personal statements, research proposals, research papers, projects, presentations, dissertation, theses, movie reviews, Book reviews, application papers, among others.
Having trouble with a homework question? Our skilled assignment writers are here to provide answers to all types of queries, ranging from fundamental mathematics to cutting-edge rocket science!
